Draft Bank of England and Financial Services (Consequential Amendments) Regulations 2017 — Reflecting Bank of England Becoming the Prudential Regulation Authority — 25 Jan 2017 at 19:39

The majority of MPs taking part in this vote supported making consequential amendments to a wide range of acts to reflect the Bank of England being made the Prudential Regulation Authority.

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

The regulations make consequential amendments following from the Bank of England being made the Prudential Regulation Authority via the Bank of England and Financial Services Act 2016

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con281 0085.4%
DUP6 0075.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 0033.3%
Lab1 143062.6%
LDem0 5055.6%
PC0 1033.3%
SDLP0 30100.0%
SNP0 38070.4%
UKIP1 00100.0%
UUP2 00100.0%
Total:292 191075.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

Simon DanczukRochdaleLabaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive