Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Bill [HL] — Report (2nd Day) — 17 Jan 2018 at 17:30

Moved by Lord Judge

71A: Clause 41, page 28, line 38, at end insert-“( ) Regulations under subsection (1) may not make provisions that create new criminal offences.”

Ayes 264, Noes 184.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con3 173 (+2 tell)70.4%
Crossbench49 (+1 tell) 330.1%
DUP0 3100.0%
Green1 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 050.0%
Independent Ulster Unionist0 1100.0%
Judge5 (+1 tell) 042.9%
Lab117 057.9%
LDem75 074.3%
Non-affiliated8 333.3%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:262 18355.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Viscount Hailsham Conaye
Baroness Shackleton of BelgraviaCon (front bench)aye
The Duke of WellingtonConaye
Lord Dear Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive