European Union (Withdrawal) Bill — Programme — Consideration of Lords Amendments — 12 Jun 2018 at 12:46

The majority of MPs voted in favour of proposed time limits, including an overall two-day limit, for considering amendments to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill.

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was[1]:

  • That the following provisions shall apply to the European Union (Withdrawal) Bill for the purpose of supplementing the Orders of 11 September 2017 (European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (Programme)) and 16 January 2018 (European Union (Withdrawal) Bill (Programme) (No.2)):
  • Consideration of Lords Amendments
  • 1. Proceedings on consideration of Lords Amendments shall be completed in two days.
  • 2. The proceedings shall be taken in the order shown in the first column of the following Table.
  • 3. The proceedings shall (so far as not previously concluded) be brought to a conclusion at the times specified in the second column of the Table.
  • TABLE
  • Lords Amendments
  • Time for conclusion of proceedings
  • Amendments 110, 128, 37, 39, 125, 19, 52, 10, 43, 45, 20, 11 to 14, 18, 21 to 23, 44, 47, 102 to 107, 112, 113, 115 to 119, 121 to 124, 126, 127, 130 to 134, 136 to 140, 142 to 148, 150, 152, 154, 156 to 158, 171, and 172.
  • Three hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments on the first day.
  • Amendments 25, 15 to 17, 26 to 31, 46, 48 to 50, 54 to 101, 108, 109, 111, 114, 120, 129, 135, 141, 149, 151, 153, 155, 162, 165, 169, and 173 to 196.
  • Six hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments on the first day.
  • Amendments 51, 1, 2, 5, 53, 4, 3, 24, 32, 6 to 9, 33 to 36, 38, 40 to 42, 159 to 161, 163, 164, 166 to 168, and 170.
  • Six hours after the commencement of proceedings on consideration of Lords amendments on the second day.
  • Subsequent stages
  • 4. Any further Message from the Lords may be programmed.

See Hansard[1] for a properly formatted table.

==

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con309 (+2 tell) 2098.7%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 20100.0%
Lab2 248 (+2 tell)096.9%
LDem0 11091.7%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 350100.0%
Total:321 303098.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Kenneth ClarkeRushcliffeCon (front bench)no
Anna SoubryBroxtoweConno
Frank FieldBirkenheadLab (minister)aye
Kate HoeyVauxhallLab (minister)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive