Taxation (Cross-Border Trade) Bill — Schedule 8 Paragraph 14 — VAT on Imports from Territories in a Customs Union With the UK — Powers of Ministers — 16 Jul 2018 at 21:00

The majority of MPs voted not to allow ministers to make regulations on the VAT treatment of goods entering the UK from territory that is in a Customs union with the UK.

A customs union between two territories is defined as arrangements such that there are no customs duties payable on goods moving between the two territories.

MPs were considering the Taxation (Cross-Border Trade) Bill[1].

The amendment supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • Amendment proposed: 73, page 135, leave out paragraph 14.

The amendment removed paragraph 14 from Schedule 8 of the Bill[2]. The paragraph sought to add a new clause to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 titled: Territories forming part of a customs union with UK which began:

  • (1) This section applies if there are arrangements that have effect for the purposes of import duty as a result of section 31 of TCTA 2018 (territories forming part of a customs union with UK).
  • (2) The Commissioners may make regulations charging VAT on customs union acquisitions.
  • (3) A “customs union acquisition” is an acquisition from a country or territory in the customs union—
  • (a) of goods which enter the United Kingdom, and
  • (b) which is not exempted by the regulations.

The explanatory notes to the Bill[3] summarise the effect of the removed paragraph, stating:

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con290 (+2 tell) 11095.6%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 1033.3%
Lab3 241 (+2 tell)094.6%
LDem0 9075.0%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 33094.3%
Total:303 300094.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Heidi AllenSouth CambridgeshireCon (front bench)no
Kenneth ClarkeRushcliffeCon (front bench)no
Jonathan DjanoglyHuntingdonCon (front bench)no
Dominic GrieveBeaconsfieldCon (front bench)no
Stephen HammondWimbledonCon (front bench)no
Phillip LeeBracknellConno
Nicky MorganLoughboroughCon (front bench)no
Bob NeillBromley and ChislehurstCon (front bench)no
Antoinette SandbachEddisburyCon (front bench)no
Anna SoubryBroxtoweConno
Sarah WollastonTotnesCon (front bench)no
Frank FieldBirkenheadLab (minister)aye
Kate HoeyVauxhallLab (minister)aye
Graham StringerBlackley and BroughtonLab (minister)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive