Trade Bill — New Clause 3 — Free Trade Agreements: Parliamentary Scrutiny and Consent — 17 Jul 2018 at 15:15

The majority of MPs voted against all new free trade agreements being subject to parliamentary scrutiny and consent.

MPs were considering the Trade Bill[1].

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Free trade agreements: Parliamentary scrutiny and consent and stated:

  • (1) The Secretary of State shall not commence negotiations relating to a free trade agreement unless—
  • (a) a Minister of the Crown has laid before Parliament a sustainability impact assessment conducted by a credible body independent of government following consultation with—
  • (i) each devolved authority,
  • (ii) public bodies, businesses, trade unions and non-governmental organisations which, in the opinion of the Minister, have a relevant interest, and
  • (iii) the public,
  • and the assessment shall include both qualitative and quantitative assessments of the potential impacts of the proposed trade agreement, including social, economic, environmental, gender, human rights, labour, development and regional impacts,
  • (b) a Minister of the Crown has laid before Parliament a draft of a negotiating mandate relating to the proposed trade agreement, setting out—
  • (i) all fields and sectors to be included in the proposed negotiations,
  • (ii) the principles to underpin the proposed negotiations,
  • (iii) any limits on the proposed negotiations, and
  • (iv) the desired outcomes from the proposed negotiations, and
  • (c) the House of Commons has approved by resolution a motion, drafted in terms which permit amendment, setting out a proposed negotiating mandate and authorising the Secretary of State to enter negotiations on the proposed trade agreement on the basis of that mandate, and the House of Lords has approved a resolution in the same terms as that approved by the House of Commons.
  • (2) The United Kingdom may not become a signatory to a free trade agreement unless—
  • (a) during the course of the negotiations, the text of the trade agreement as so far agreed or consolidated has been made publicly available within ten working days of the close of each negotiating round,
  • (b) between each round of negotiations, all documents relating to the negotiations have been made available for scrutiny by select committees in both Houses of Parliament,
  • (c) upon conclusion of the negotiations, the House of Commons has approved by resolution a motion, drafted in terms which permit amendment, setting out the text of the trade agreement as negotiated and authorising the Secretary of State to sign the proposed agreement, and the House of Lords has approved a resolution in the same terms as that approved by the House of Commons, and
  • (d) the text of the trade agreement includes provision for a review of the operation and impacts of the agreement no later than ten years after the day on which the agreement comes into force.”

The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following explanatory statement:

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con303 (+2 tell) 0096.5%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 4083.3%
Lab0 232089.9%
LDem0 10 (+1 tell)091.7%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 32 (+1 tell)094.3%
Total:314 283093.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive