Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [HL] — Report — 22 Oct 2018 at 15:30

Moved by Lord Rosser

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 19, at end insert-“(4A) The Secretary of State may not make regulations designating an international agreement under section 52 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (interception in accordance with overseas requests) where that agreement provides for requests to be made by the competent authorities of a country or territory, or of more than one country or territory, in which a person found guilty of a criminal offence may be sentenced to death for the offence under the general criminal law of the country or territory concerned.(4B) Subsection 4A does not apply if the country or territory has, within the international agreement, given assurances that the death penalty will not be imposed in any case in which or in whose preparation electronic data obtained under this Act has been used.”

Moved by Lord Paddick

2: Clause 1, leave out from beginning to “given” in subsection (4B) and insert-“(4A) The Secretary of State may not make regulations designating an international co-operation agreement providing for the use of-(a) section 52 of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (interception in accordance with overseas requests), or(b) any other enactment which provides for the collection of electronic data,unless the condition in subsection 4B is met.(4B) The condition is that the states party to or participating in the international co-operation agreement have”

Ayes 108, Noes 185.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £100 credit (until 20th December) for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con156 (+2 tell) 055.8%
Crossbench20 2322.3%
Green0 1100.0%
Judge1 06.7%
Lab0 135.9%
LDem2 65 (+2 tell)63.9%
Non-affiliated3 216.1%
PC0 150.0%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:183 10534.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Aberdare Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Chartres Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Cox Crossbenchno
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Evans of WeardaleCrossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Harries of PentregarthCrossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbenchno
Baroness Howe of IdlicoteCrossbenchno
Lord Janvrin Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Luce Crossbenchno
Lord Macpherson of Earl's CourtCrossbench (front bench)no
The Countess of MarCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Palmer Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Turnbull Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Vaux of HarrowdenCrossbenchno
Lord Dykes LDem (front bench)no
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDem (front bench)no
Baroness D'Souza Non-affiliatedaye
Lord Hussain Non-affiliatedaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive