Finance Bill — Clause 89 — Report on the Implications for the Tax System of Withdrawal From the European Union — 19 Nov 2018 at 22:15

The majority of MPs voted not to require a report on the outcomes of the negotiations on the withdrawal of the United Kingdom from the European Union leading to the need to amend tax legislation, the fiscal and economic impact of those negotiations and amendments, and comparing the situation with that of an agreement on a negotiated withdrawal agreement and a framework for a future relationship with the European Union.

MPs were considering the Finance Bill[1]

The amendment rejected in this vote was:

  • page 66, line 30, at end insert—

‘(1A) The Chancellor of the Exchequer must, no later than a week after the passing of this Act and before exercising the power in subsection (1), lay before the House of Commons a review of the following matters—

  • (a) the fiscal and economic effects of the exercise of those powers and of the outcome of negotiations for the United Kingdom’s withdrawal from the European Union giving rise to their exercise;
  • (b) a comparison of those fiscal and economic effects with the effects if a negotiated withdrawal agreement and a framework for a future relationship with the EU had been agreed to;
  • (c) any differences in the exercise of those powers in respect of—
  • (i) Great Britain, and
  • (ii) Northern Ireland;
  • (d) any differential effects in relation to the matters specified in paragraphs (a) and (b) in relation between—
  • (i) Great Britain, and
  • (ii) Northern Ireland.”

Had it not been rejected this amendment would have impacted clause 89[2] of the Bill which empowered the treasury to make amendments to tax legislation in consequence of the United Kingdom withdrawing from the European Union.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con294 (+2 tell) 0093.7%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 2042.9%
Lab0 223 (+2 tell)087.5%
LDem0 10083.3%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 32091.4%
Total:295 272090.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive