Mental Capacity (Amendment) Bill [HL] — Report (2nd Day) — 27 Nov 2018 at 15:30
Moved by Baroness Watkins of Tavistock
29: Schedule 1, page 10, line 8, at end insert-“Rights to information11A(1) Prior to the authorisation process, the cared-for person must be fully informed of their rights.(2) The responsible body must take such steps as are practicable to ensure that the cared-for person and any appropriate person or Independent Mental Capacity Advocate representing and supporting them understand the possible outcome of the assessments, the reasons why the cared-for person may be deprived of their liberty and their rights-(a) to request an Approved Mental Capacity Professional’s assessment and review of the arrangements,(b) to advocacy, and(c) to challenge the authorisation in court.(3) If an Independent Mental Capacity Advocate is appointed under Part 5, the advocate is to take such steps as are practicable to help the cared-for person and the appropriate person to understand the following matters-(a) the steps involved in the authorisation process,(b) the purpose, duration and effect of the authorisation,(c) any conditions to which the authorisation is subject,(d) the reasons why the cared-for person met the qualifying requirements in question,(e) the right to object to the authorisation and the right to request a review by an Approved Mental Capacity Professional,(f) the outcome of a review of the arrangements,(g) the relevant rights of the cared-for person,(h) how the cared-for person may exercise relevant rights.(4) In this paragraph, “relevant rights” includes the right to make an application to the court to challenge an authorisation decision in court under section 21ZA and the right to request a review of the arrangements.(5) The responsible body must ensure that cases are referred to court when the cared-for person’s right to a court review is engaged.”
Ayes 277, Noes 192.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Con||0||173 (+2 tell)||68.9%|
|Crossbench||56 (+1 tell)||8||37.1%|
|Independent Ulster Unionist||0||1||100.0%|
|Lab||130 (+1 tell)||0||67.2%|
|Lord Curry of Kirkharle||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Inglewood||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Lord Kakkar||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Mawson||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Prior of Brampton||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord St John of Bletso||Crossbench||no|