Finance Bill — New Clause 18 — Review of Effects on Measures in Act of Migration in Various Scenarios Relating to the UK Withdrawing, or not, from the EU — 8 Jan 2019 at 19:53

The majority of MPs voted against carrying out a review of the effects on the provisions in the Bill of migration in various scenarios relating to the United Kingdom withdrawing, or not, from the European Union.

MPs were considering the Finance Bill[1].

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled Review of effects on measures in Act of certain changes in migration levels and stated:

  • “(1) The Chancellor of the Exchequer must review the effects on the provisions of this Act of migration in the scenarios in subsection (2) and lay a report of that review before the House of Commons within one month of the passing of this Act.
  • (2) Those scenarios are that—
  • (a) the United Kingdom does not leave the European Union,
  • (b) the United Kingdom leaves the European Union without a negotiated withdrawal agreement,
  • (c) the United Kingdom leaves the European Union following a negotiated withdrawal agreement, and remains in the single market and customs union,
  • (d) the United Kingdom leaves the United Kingdom on the terms of the draft withdrawal agreement of 14 November 2018.
  • (3) In respect of each of those scenarios the review must consider separately the effects of—
  • (a) migration by EU nationals, and
  • (b) migration by non-EU nationals.
  • (4) In respect of each of those scenarios the review must consider separately the effects on the measures in each part of the United Kingdom and each region of England.
  • (5) In this section—
  • “parts of the United Kingdom” means—
  • (a) England,
  • (b) Scotland,
  • (c) Wales, and
  • (d) Northern Ireland;
  • “regions of England” has the same meaning as that used by the Office for National Statistics.”

The rejected clause was accompanied by the following explanatory statement:

Debate in Parliament |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con301 (+2 tell) 0095.6%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 3037.5%
Lab0 237092.6%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 33 (+2 tell)0100.0%
Total:311 289094.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive