Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill [Lords] — Clause 1 -Journalistic Protections — Production Orders Requested by Overseas Authorities — 30 Jan 2019 at 15:30

The majority of MPs voted not to apply UK safeguards relating to state access to journalistic data when such material is requested by other countries or territories.

MPs were considering the Crime (Overseas Production Orders) Bill[1].

The proposed amendment rejected in this vote was:

  • Amendment 18, page 2, line 3, at end insert—
  • “(5A) The Secretary of State may only make regulations designating an international agreement under subsection (5) where that agreement—
  • (a) provides for safeguards and special procedures in respect of applications by competent authorities of a country or territory other than the United Kingdom for orders in respect of journalistic data and confidential journalistic data that are equivalent to those in this Act, and
  • (b) provides for at least as much protection for freedom of expression and the protection of journalists’ rights sources as Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights and section 10 of the Contempt of Court Act 1981.”

The rejected amendment was accompanied by the following explanatory statement:

  • This amendment would seek to ensure that the terms on which other states may access electronic data held in the UK mirror the UK’s own safeguards for press freedom.

Had it not been rejected the amendment would have impacted Clause 1 of the Bill[2], which began:

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Con287 (+2 tell) 0091.2%
DUP10 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 4050.0%
Lab0 224 (+2 tell)088.3%
LDem0 9081.8%
PC0 40100.0%
SNP0 34097.1%
Total:297 276089.9%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

TWe're working on updating the site, but if you'd like to talk to us about the project, please email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive