European Union (Withdrawal Agreement) Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 14 — 20 Jan 2020 at 19:38

Moved by Lord Mackay of Clashfern

14: Clause 26, page 30, line 20, leave out paragraph (d) and insert-“(d) after subsection (5) insert-“(5A) Where a court or tribunal other than the Supreme Court or the High Court of Justiciary is of the opinion that any retained EU case law that is relevant to an issue before it should be departed from, that court or tribunal must-(i) in its judgment set out the reasons for that opinion, and(ii) refer the case to the Supreme Court or, as appropriate, the High Court of Justiciary,and if the Supreme Court or High Court of Justiciary grants leave for the case to proceed, it must decide whether to depart from the EU case law on the issue before it.”, and”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would introduce a procedure which could be initiated in any court of the United Kingdom and result in a decision which is authoritative in the United Kingdom without any interference with the independence of the judiciary.

Ayes 206, Noes 186.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con7 176 (+2 tell)62.9%
Crossbench33 317.8%
Green1 050.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge4 026.7%
Lab89 (+2 tell) 040.4%
LDem65 262.0%
Non-affiliated2 212.5%
PC1 050.0%
UUP1 1100.0%
Total:204 18444.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bowness Conaye
Viscount Eccles Con (front bench)aye
Baroness Eccles of MoultonConaye
Lord Mackay of ClashfernConaye
Lord Marlesford Conaye
The Duke of WellingtonConaye
Baroness Wheatcroft Conaye
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbenchno
Baroness Falkner of MargravineLDemno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive