Trade Bill — New Clause 17 — International Trade Agreements — Protection of the NHS, the Health and Care Sector and Public Sector Workers — 20 Jul 2020 at 21:00

The majority of MPs voted against ensuring international trade agreements protect the NHS, the wider health and care sector and those working in the public sector.

MPs were considering the Trade Bill[1].

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: International trade agreements: health or care services and stated:

  • (1) Regulations under section 2(1) may make provision for the purpose of implementing an international trade agreement only if the conditions in subsections (2) and (3) are met in relation to the application of that agreement in any part of the United Kingdom.
  • (2) The condition in this subsection is that no provision of that international trade agreement in any way undermines or restricts the ability of an appropriate authority—
  • (a) to provide a comprehensive publicly funded health service free at the point of delivery,
  • (b) to protect the employment rights or terms and conditions of employment for public sector employees and those working in publicly funded health or care sectors,
  • (c) to regulate and maintain the quality and safety of health or care services,
  • (d) to regulate and control the pricing and reimbursement systems for the purchase of medicines or medical devices, or
  • (e) to regulate and maintain the level of protection afforded in relation to patient data, public health data and publicly provided social care data relating to UK citizens.
  • (3) The condition in this subsection is that the agreement—
  • (a) explicitly excludes application of any provision within that agreement to publicly funded health or care services,
  • (b) explicitly excludes provision for any Investor-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS) clause that provides, or is related to, the delivery of public services, health care, care or public health,
  • (c) explicitly excludes the use of any negative listing, standstill or ratchet clause that provides, or is related to, the delivery of public services, health care, care or public health,
  • (d) contains explicit recognition that an appropriate authority (within the meaning of section 4) has the right to enact policies, legislation and regulation which protects and promotes health, public health, social care and public safety in health or care services, and
  • (e) prohibits the sale of patient data, public health data and publicly provided social care data.
  • (4) For the purposes of this section—
  • “negative listing” means a listing only of exceptions, exclusions or limits to commitments made by parties to the agreement;
  • “ratchet” in relation to any provision in an agreement means any provision whereby a party, if (after the agreement has been ratified) it has unilaterally removed a barrier in an area where it had made a commitment before the agreement was ratified, may not reintroduce that barrier, and
  • “standstill” in relation to any provision in an agreement means any provision by which parties list barriers which are in force at the time that they sign the agreement and undertake not to introduce any new barriers.

The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following statement from its proposer:

  • This amendment would aim to protect the NHS and publicly funded health and care services in other parts of the UK from any form of control from outside the UK.
  • [1] Parliament's webpage on the Trade Bill

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con336 (+2 tell) 0092.9%
DUP0 6075.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 180 (+2 tell)090.1%
LDem0 10090.9%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 44091.7%
Total:337 248091.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive