Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Second Reading — 5 Oct 2020 at 21:30

A majority of MPs voted to enable certain public bodies to authorise criminal conduct by their covert human intelligence sources.

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Second time.

The Bill provides for a statutory power for the security and intelligence agencies, law enforcement agencies and a limited number of other public authorities including the Department of Health and Social Care and the Environment Agency to authorise Covert Human Intelligence Sources (CHIS) - who may be volunteer agents or staff - to participate in criminal conduct where it is necessary and proportionate to do so for a limited set of specified purposes.[1][2][3]

The explanatory notes to the Bill[3] state: "The activity that will be authorised under the Bill is not new activity. It is a continuation of existing practice that is currently authorised using a variety of legal bases". The notes refer to "an existing provision in RIPA for the authorisation of very limited criminal conduct, where it is incidental to the CHIS’s use and conduct" and state: "other public authorities rely on a combination of express, implied and common law powers."

The explanatory notes to the Bill[3] state: "The effect of a criminal conduct authorisation issued under the Bill regime will be to render the authorised conduct “lawful for all purposes”", though that statement is not contained within the Bill itsself.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con179 (+2 tell) 0049.7%
DUP2 0025.0%
Independent1 0050.0%
Lab0 18 (+2 tell)09.9%
LDem0 000.0%
PC0 2066.7%
SDLP0 1050.0%
Total:182 21035.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive