Immigration and Social Security Co-ordination (EU Withdrawal) Bill — After Clause 1 — Impact of section 1 on the social care sector — 19 Oct 2020 at 21:00

“For many, having no recourse to public funds poses further barriers to moving people on safely, putting victims at risk of homelessness and destitution, and making it more likely that they will fall back into exploitation and trafficking.”
“increase the pressure on the social care sector, something that would be particularly difficult to understand at a time when…care”
“central to the… pandemic frontline response.”
“There comes a point where we need to stop just pulling people out of the river. We need to go upstream and find out why they’re falling in.”
“Today, the Home Office is already a very different place. We are listening to community leaders and organisations and urgent change is underway”.
“With so much immigration control now being delegated to banks, landlords, and employers, the complicated system being proposed (involving websites, emails, passport numbers, passcodes, and security questions to prove one’s status) leaves everyone in an uncertain position. Legitimate migrants will struggle to prove their status and employers, service providers, and landlords will be reluctant to take part in, or to trust, such a convoluted procedure. A piece of physical proof that can be produced on demand would give everyone the certainty they need.”
“exceptional or compelling reasons to justify a grant”
“cannot be lost, stolen, damaged or tampered with.”
“absolutely committed to the family reunion of refugee families”.
“The way a government treats refugees is very instructive because it shows you how they would treat the rest of us if they thought they could get away with it.”

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con329 (+2 tell) 0090.9%
DUP4 0050.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 188 (+2 tell)094.1%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 47097.9%
Total:334 254092.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive