United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 64 — 25 Nov 2020 at 16:30
Moved by Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd
64: Clause 42, leave out Clause 42Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment is intended to remove the provision for a Minister of the Crown to provide financial assistance for economic development etc. anywhere in the United Kingdom.
Ayes 323, Noes 241.
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
|Party||Majority (Content)||Minority (Not-Content)||Turnout|
|Independent Ulster Unionist||0||1||100.0%|
|Baroness Gardner of Parkes||Con||aye|
|Baroness McIntosh of Pickering||Con (front bench)||aye|
|Lord Butler of Brockwell||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Carey of Clifton||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Chartres||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Curry of Kirkharle||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|The Earl of Devon||Crossbench||no|
|The Earl of Erroll||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Hogan-Howe||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord King of Lothbury||Crossbench||no|
|Lord Laming||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Patel||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Powell of Bayswater||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Thurlow||Crossbench (front bench)||no|
|Lord Austin of Dudley||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord Faulks||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Fox of Buckley||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord Moore of Etchingham||Non-affiliated||no|
|Baroness Stowell of Beeston||Non-affiliated (front bench)||no|
|Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston||Non-affiliated||no|
|Lord Willoughby de Broke||Non-affiliated||no|