United Kingdom Internal Market Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — Motion B1 (as an amendment to Motion B) — 9 Dec 2020 at 14:45
Moved by Lord Stevenson of Balmacara
8L: Clause 10, leave out Clause 10 and insert the following new Clause-“Exclusions from market access principles: public interest derogations(1) The United Kingdom market access principles do not apply to, and sections 2(3) and 5(3) do not affect the operation of, any requirements which-(a) pursue a legitimate aim,(b) are a proportionate means of achieving that aim, and(c) are not a disguised restriction on trade.(2) A requirement is considered to pursue a legitimate aim if it makes a contribution to the achievement of-(a) environmental standards and protection,(b) animal welfare,(c) consumer standards, including digital and artificial intelligence privacy rights,(d) employment rights and protections,(e) health and life of humans, animals or plants,(f) protection of public health, or(g) equality entitlements, rights and protections.(3) A requirement is considered disproportionate if the legitimate aim being pursued in the destination part of the United Kingdom is already achieved to the same or higher extent by requirements in the originating part of the United Kingdom.””
Ayes 295, Noes 250.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 2 | 0 | 7.7% |
Con | 1 | 208 | 79.2% |
Crossbench | 53 | 23 | 43.9% |
DUP | 0 | 5 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 3 | 1 | 33.3% |
Lab | 135 | 0 | 74.6% |
LDem | 80 | 1 | 92.0% |
Non-affiliated | 17 | 11 | 47.5% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 295 | 250 | 67.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Aberdare | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Barker | LDem (front bench) | no |
Lord Broers | Crossbench | no |
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood | Judge (front bench) | no |
Lord Cameron of Dillington | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Carey of Clifton | Crossbench | no |
Lord Carlile of Berriew | Crossbench | no |
Lord Carrington | Crossbench | no |
Lord Cromwell | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Cumberlege | Con | aye |
Baroness D'Souza | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Deech | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Devon | Crossbench | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Fox of Buckley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal Green | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Kalms | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Kilclooney | Crossbench | no |
Lord King of Lothbury | Crossbench | no |
Lord Laming | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Mawson | Crossbench | no |
Baroness O'Loan | Crossbench | no |
Lord Palmer | Crossbench | no |
Lord Pearson of Rannoch | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Stirrup | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Taylor of Warwick | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Viscount Waverley | Crossbench | no |
Lord Willoughby de Broke | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Wilson of Tillyorn | Crossbench | no |