Trade Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 23 — 6 Jan 2021 at 17:00

Moved by Baroness Kidron

23: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause-“Protection of children online(1) The United Kingdom may only become a signatory to an international trade agreement if the conditions in subsection (2) are satisfied.(2) International trade agreements must be consistent with-(a) other international treaties to which the United Kingdom is a party, and the domestic law of England and Wales (including any changes to the law after the trade agreement is signed), regarding the protection of children and other vulnerable user groups using the internet;(b) the provisions on data protection for children, as set out in the age appropriate design code under section 123 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (age-appropriate design code) and other provisions of that Act which impact children; and(c) online protections provided for children in the United Kingdom that the Secretary of State considers necessary.(3) In this section a “child” means any person under the age of 18.”

Ayes 340, Noes 248.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop9 031.0%
Con4 20771.0%
Crossbench70 1441.6%
DUP3 060.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge5 033.3%
Lab147 065.3%
LDem83 177.8%
Non-affiliated7 331.3%
PC1 050.0%
UKIP0 133.3%
UUP0 2100.0%
Total:332 22860.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Cooper of WindrushConaye
The Earl of Cork and OrreryCon (front bench)aye
Lord Holmes of RichmondCon (front bench)aye
Baroness Wheatcroft Conaye
Lord Anderson of IpswichCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Houghton of RichmondCrossbenchno
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rana Crossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thurlow Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Trevethin and Oaksey Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Bhatia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive