Trade Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 23 — 6 Jan 2021 at 17:00
Moved by Baroness Kidron
23: After Clause 2, insert the following new Clause-“Protection of children online(1) The United Kingdom may only become a signatory to an international trade agreement if the conditions in subsection (2) are satisfied.(2) International trade agreements must be consistent with-(a) other international treaties to which the United Kingdom is a party, and the domestic law of England and Wales (including any changes to the law after the trade agreement is signed), regarding the protection of children and other vulnerable user groups using the internet;(b) the provisions on data protection for children, as set out in the age appropriate design code under section 123 of the Data Protection Act 2018 (age-appropriate design code) and other provisions of that Act which impact children; and(c) online protections provided for children in the United Kingdom that the Secretary of State considers necessary.(3) In this section a “child” means any person under the age of 18.”
Ayes 340, Noes 248.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 10 | 0 | 38.5% |
| Con | 1 | 220 | 84.0% |
| Crossbench | 78 | 15 | 53.1% |
| DUP | 4 | 0 | 80.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 5 | 0 | 41.7% |
| Lab | 144 | 0 | 79.6% |
| LDem | 79 | 0 | 90.8% |
| Non-affiliated | 15 | 11 | 44.1% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 340 | 248 | 72.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Holmes of Richmond | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Anderson of Ipswich | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Botham | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Carey of Clifton | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Carrington | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Cavendish of Little Venice | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Deech | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Hogg | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Houghton of Richmond | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Powell of Bayswater | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Stirrup | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Thurlow | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Trevethin and Oaksey | Crossbench | no |
| Viscount Waverley | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Bhatia | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
| Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Green of Hurstpierpoint | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Kalms | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Lupton | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Moore of Etchingham | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Pearson of Rannoch | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Taylor of Warwick | Non-affiliated | no |