Covert Human Intelligence Sources (Criminal Conduct) Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 34 (to Amendment 33) — 13 Jan 2021 at 19:30

Moved by Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd

34: After Clause 2, at end insert-“(6) If upon notification under subsection (3) a Judicial Commissioner determines that the authorisation should not have been granted, the person who granted the authorisation must be immediately informed and all further activities that will or might be undertaken pursuant to the authorisation must cease forthwith, subject to the power of the Judicial Commissioner to allow actions specified by the Judicial Commissioner to continue for the purpose of discontinuing the activities for which authorisation had been granted.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment is to ensure that on a determination by a Judicial Commissioner that an authority should not have been granted, activities under the authorisation cease forthwith.

Ayes 298, Noes 259.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con6 20671.4%
Crossbench55 1936.6%
DUP0 360.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Liberal Democrat1 0100.0%
Judge3 020.0%
Lab132 058.7%
LDem82 176.9%
Non-affiliated10 134.4%
PC1 050.0%
UUP0 2100.0%
Total:292 23258.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Bowness Conaye
Baroness Cavendish of Little VeniceConaye
Lord Cooper of WindrushConaye
Lord Inglewood Con (front bench)aye
The Duke of WellingtonConaye
Baroness Wheatcroft Conaye
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Dannatt Crossbenchno
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Evans of WeardaleCrossbenchno
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Manningham-Buller Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Powell of BayswaterCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Rana Crossbenchno
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thurlow Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Lord Kalms Non-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive