Trade Bill — After Clause 2 — Parliamentary approval of trade agreements — 19 Jan 2021 at 17:45

“burning of villages, the use of live ammunition against protestors, arbitrary arrest and”
“detention…enforced disappearances, deaths in custody,”
“civilians, including women, children and the elderly”.
“persistent gross violations of internationally recognized human rights.”
“available diplomatic and punitive tools”.
“Parliament would remain sovereign,”
“but it would require primary legislation to reverse the court’s decision effectively”,-[Official Report, House of Lords, 7 December 2020; Vol. 808, c. 1053.]
“as far as possible that a future trade agreement is consistent with United Kingdom levels of statutory protection regarding, among other things-
(a) human, animal or plant life or health;
(b) animal welfare;
(c) the environment;
(d) food safety, quality, hygiene and traceability;”
“a Minister of the Crown ensures as far as possible that a future trade agreement is consistent with United Kingdom levels of statutory protection”
“not to kill us in cold blood, but to make us slowly disappear. So slowly that no one would notice.”
“All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.”
“for some baffling reason the Foreign Office still hesitates to use the term genocide”
“the UK government has already weakened protections around food imports and is failing to consider the impact of trade on public health, animal welfare and the environment with adequate rigour or transparency.”
“should ensure that all food eaten in the UK…is produced in a way that matches the high standards of production expected of UK farmers”
“the crime of all crimes”.
“we shouldn’t be engaged in free trade negotiations with countries abusing human rights.”
“private operators should be allowed into the service, and, indeed should compete on price.”
“we need to think about new ways of getting private money into the NHS.”
“any version of article 32.10 of the USMCA that would constrain the UK’s ability to negotiate our own trade agreement with China”.-[Official Report, 12 May 2020; Vol. 676, c. 111.]
“International bilateral trade agreements are revoked”-
“if the High Court of England and Wales makes a preliminary determination that they should be revoked”.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con343 (+2 tell) 11097.8%
DUP8 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 199 (+2 tell)099.5%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 480100.0%
Total:352 277098.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Peter AldousWaveneyConno
Tracey CrouchChatham and AylesfordConno
David DavisHaltemprice and HowdenConno
Jonathan DjanoglyHuntingdonConno
Roger GaleNorth ThanetCon (front bench)no
Neil HudsonPenrith and The BorderCon (front bench)no
Jason McCartneyColne ValleyConno
Bob NeillBromley and ChislehurstCon (front bench)no
Bob SeelyIsle of WightCon (front bench)no
John StevensonCarlisleCon (front bench)no
Julian SturdyYork OuterCon (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive