Counter-Terrorism and Sentencing Bill — Report — Amendment 1 — 3 Mar 2021 at 13:45

Moved by Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames

1: Clause 1, page 1, line 8, at end insert-“(aa) after subsection (1) insert-“(1A) The court may not assume that an offence has a terrorist connection for the purpose of this section unless-(a) the defendant has admitted in person and in open court that the offence has such a terrorist connection, or(b) where the defendant does not make such an admission, the court is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt upon a trial of the issue that the offence has a terrorist connection.(1B) A trial held pursuant to subsection (1A)(b) above must be determined by a jury unless the court determines that the interests of justice would be better served by a trial by a judge alone upon evidence admissible in a criminal court.””Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would require a trial of the issue as to whether or not there is a terrorist connection in relation to an aggravated offence.

Ayes 126, Noes 281.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con204 169.0%
Crossbench28 3028.7%
DUP3 060.0%
Green0 2100.0%
Judge3 126.7%
Lab1 104.9%
LDem1 7772.2%
Non-affiliated6 225.0%
UKIP1 033.3%
UUP2 0100.0%
Total:249 12341.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Inglewood Con (front bench)aye
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Lord Anderson of IpswichCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Brookeborough Crossbenchno
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Campbell of SurbitonCrossbenchno
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Cromwell Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Deech Crossbenchno
Lord Evans of WeardaleCrossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Baroness Hallett Crossbenchno
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Janvrin Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kerr of KinlochardCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kilclooney Crossbenchno
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ravensdale Crossbenchno
Lord Russell of LiverpoolCrossbench (front bench)no
The Duke of SomersetCrossbenchno
Lord Trevethin and Oaksey Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Watkins of TavistockCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Thomas of CwmgieddJudge (front bench)aye
Lord Grabiner Labno
Baroness Nicholson of WinterbourneLDemno
Baroness Ritchie of DownpatrickNon-affiliated (front bench)aye
Lord Smith of FinsburyNon-affiliatedaye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive