Contingencies Fund (No. 2) Bill — Clause 1 — Temporary increase in capital limit of Contingencies Fund — 11 Mar 2021 at 13:30
“In the examples we examined where there were potential conflicts of interest involving ministers, we found that the ministers had properly declared their interests, and we found no evidence of their involvement in procurement decisions or contract management.”
“Government was having to work at pace…in a highly competitive international market”
“secured unprecedented volumes of essential supplies…to protect front-line workers.”
“There is still no clear evidence to judge NHST&T’s overall effectiveness.”
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.
Party | Majority (No) | Minority (Aye) | Both | Turnout |
Alliance | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Con | 358 (+2 tell) | 0 | 0 | 98.9% |
DUP | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12.5% |
Green | 0 | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent | 1 | 4 | 0 | 100.0% |
Lab | 0 | 197 (+2 tell) | 0 | 99.5% |
LDem | 0 | 11 | 0 | 100.0% |
PC | 0 | 3 | 0 | 100.0% |
SDLP | 0 | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
SNP | 0 | 47 | 0 | 100.0% |
Total: | 360 | 266 | 0 | 98.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division
Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote
Name | Constituency | Party | Vote | |
no rebellions |