Domestic Abuse Bill — Commons Reasons and Amendments — Motion F1 (as an amendment to Motion F) — 21 Apr 2021 at 17:30

Moved by The Lord Bishop of Gloucester

41B: After Clause 72, insert the following new Clause-“Recourse to public funds for duration of pilot scheme(1) For the duration of the pilot Support for Migrant Victims Scheme announced by the Government on 14 April 2021, the Secretary of State must make provision that a person who-(a) is a victim of domestic abuse; and(b) provides evidence in one or more of the forms in subsection (3); shall not be subject to restrictions on recourse to public funds, due to their immigration status, provided for in the provisions listed in subsection (2).(2) The provisions referred to in subsection (1) are-(a) section (3)(1)(c)(ii) of the Immigration Act 1971;(b) section 115 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999;(c) Schedule 3 to the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002;(d) section 21 of the Immigration Act 2014.(3) For the purposes of this section, evidence that a person is a victim of domestic abuse may consist of one or more of the following-(a) a relevant conviction, police caution or protection notice;(b) a relevant court order (including without notice, ex parte, interim or final orders), including a non-molestation undertaking or order, occupation order, domestic abuse protection order, forced marriage protection order or other protective injunction;(c) evidence of relevant criminal proceedings for an offence concerning domestic violence or a police report confirming attendance at an incident resulting from domestic abuse;(d) evidence that a victim has been referred to a multi-agency risk assessment conference;(e) a finding of fact in the family courts of domestic abuse;(f) a medical report from a doctor at a UK hospital confirming injuries or a condition consistent with being a victim of domestic abuse;(g) a letter from a General Medical Council registered general practitioner confirming that he or she is satisfied on the basis of an examination that a person had injuries or a condition consistent with those of a victim of domestic abuse;(h) an undertaking given to a court by the alleged perpetrator of domestic abuse that he or she will not approach the applicant who is the victim of the abuse;(i) a letter from a social services department confirming its involvement in providing services to a person in respect of allegations of domestic abuse;(j) a letter of support or a report from a domestic abuse support organisation; or (k) other evidence of domestic abuse, including from a counsellor, midwife, school, witness or the victim.(4) The Secretary of State must, within 2 months of the completion of the pilot Support for Migrant Victims Scheme announced by the Government on 14 April 2021-(a) consult the Domestic Abuse Commissioner and specialist organisations that work with victims of abuse on the impact of this section on victims;(b) publish a strategy for the long-term provision of support for victims of domestic abuse who do not have leave to remain or have leave to remain subject to a condition under section 3(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1971.””

Ayes 292, Noes 233.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop9 034.6%
Con2 20978.7%
Crossbench52 1638.2%
DUP4 080.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Lab138 075.0%
LDem71 082.6%
Non-affiliated12 733.3%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:292 23364.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Newlove Con (front bench)aye
Baroness Warsi Conaye
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Lord Anderson of IpswichCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Botham Crossbenchno
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Baroness Deech Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbenchno
Baroness Hallett Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Hogg Crossbenchno
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Lord McDonald of SalfordCrossbenchno
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord Stevens of KirkwhelpingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Vaux of HarrowdenCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Bhatia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Inglewood Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive