Telecommunications (Security) Bill — New Clause 2 — Provision of Information to the Intelligence and Security Committee — 25 May 2021 at 16:30

The majority of MPs voted not to require the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament to be provided with information on Government directions made to telecommunications companies on national security grounds which has been withheld from publication.

MPs were considering the Telecommunications (Security) Bill[1][2][3]

The proposed new clause rejected in this vote was titled: Provision of information to the Intelligence and Security Committee and stated:

  • The Secretary of State must provide the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament as soon as is reasonably practicable with a copy of—
  • (a) any direction or notice (or part thereof) that is withheld from publication by the Secretary of State in the interests of national security in accordance with section 105Z11(2) or (3) of the Communications Act 2003;
  • (b) any notification of contravention given by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 105Z18(1) of the Communications Act 2003;
  • (c) any confirmation decision given by the Secretary of State in accordance with phttps://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2003/21/section/105Z20 section 105Z20(2)(a) of the Communications Act 2003];
  • (d) any reasons for making an urgent enforcement direction that are withheld by the Secretary of State in the interests of national security in the accordance with section 105Z22(5) of the Communications Act 2003; and
  • (e) any reasons for confirming or modifying an urgent enforcement direction that are withheld by the Secretary of State in the interests of national security in accordance with section 105Z23(6) of the Communications Act 2003

The rejected amendment was accompanied by the following explanatory statement from its proposer:

  • This new clause would ensure that the Intelligence and Security Committee of Parliament is provided with any information relating to a designated vendor direction, notification of contravention, urgent enforcement action or modifications to an enforcement direction made on grounds of national security.

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alba0 20100.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con355 (+2 tell) 0098.1%
DUP8 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 40100.0%
Lab0 194 (+2 tell)099.0%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 450100.0%
Total:364 263098.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive