Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill — New Clause 89 — Minimum Sentence of 7 Years for Rape — 5 Jul 2021 at 21:00

The majority of MPs voted against a statutory minimum sentence for rape of 7 years, with an exemption for exceptional circumstances.

MPs were considering the Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill[1][2]

The proposed new clause rejected by the majority of MPs in this vote was titled: Minimum sentence for an offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 and stated:

  • (1) This section applies where—
  • (a) an individual is convicted of an offence under section 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003, and
  • (b) the offence was committed after the commencement of this section and at a time when the individual was aged 18 or over.
  • (2) The court shall impose an appropriate custodial sentence (or order for detention) for a term of at least the required minimum term (with or without a fine) unless the court is of the opinion that there are exceptional circumstances relating to the offence or to the offender which justify its not doing so.
  • (3) In this section “appropriate custodial sentence (or order for detention)” means—
  • (a) in the case of an offender who is aged 18 or over when convicted, a sentence of imprisonment, and
  • (b) in the case of an offender who is aged under 18 at that time, a sentence of detention under section 91 of the Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000.
  • (4) In this section “the required minimum term” means seven years.’

The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following statement from its proposer:

  • This new clause creates a statutory minimum sentence for rape of 7 years. A court must impose at least the statutory minimum unless it is of the opinion there are exceptional circumstances relating to the offence or to the offender which justify not doing so.

The motion rejected in this vote was:

  • That the clause be added to the Bill.

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con354 (+2 tell) 3098.6%
DUP0 80100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 4080.0%
Lab0 195 (+2 tell)099.0%
LDem0 120100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
Total:354 229098.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Philip DaviesShipleyCon (front bench)aye
Esther McVeyTattonCon (front bench)aye
William WraggHazel GroveCon (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive