Covid-19: Contracts and Public Inquiry — 7 Jul 2021 at 16:08

That this House believes the Government has failed to give full details of the process behind the issuing of emergency covid-19 contracts; and therefore calls on the Government immediately to commence the covid-19 public inquiry, announced by the Prime Minister on 12 May 2021.
“attitudes to the UK Union”
“on the record for everybody to see.”-[Official Report, 22 February 2021; Vol. 689, c. 638.]
“a huge volume of correspondence was coming to Ministers via their personal email addresses”.-[Official Report, 28 June 2021; Vol. 698, c. 33.]
“Ministers have passed responsibility between the Cabinet Office and Department of Health and Social Care”.
“act solely in terms of the public interest.”
“should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends.”
“must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit”.
“are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions”.
“Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.”
“should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour.”
“Personally, would an inquiry be an unwelcome distraction for me personally, at the moment, when I’m very focussed on the vaccine programme and the vaccine programme we might need in the autumn? Who knows, I think it would be an extra burden that wasn’t necessary.”
“circumstances would lead a fair minded and informed observer to conclude that there was a real possibility, or a real danger,”
“the Government has failed to give full details of the process”
“emergency covid-19 contracts”,
“we found that the ministers had properly declared their interests, and we found no evidence of their involvement in procurement decisions or contract management.”
“insufficient documentation on key decisions”,
“contracts…have not been published in a timely manner”,
“diminished public transparency…the lack of adequate documentation”,
“apparent systemic biases in the award of PPE contracts that favoured those with political connections to the party of government in Westminster”.
“We have in this country one of the most honest public sectors of any country in the world.”-[Official Report, 25 February 2021; Vol. 689, c. 1096.]

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con355 (+2 tell) 0098.1%
DUP8 00100.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 10100.0%
Lab0 198098.0%
LDem0 110100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 43 (+2 tell)093.8%
Total:364 260097.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive