Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill [HL] — Report — Amendment 27 — 20 Jul 2021 at 16:45

Moved by Baroness Pinnock

27: After Clause 18, insert the following new Clause-“Review of the financial impact of the Act(1) Within 6 months of the day on which this Act is passed the Secretary of State must carry out a review of the financial impact of this Act on leaseholders.(2) The review must make a recommendation as to whether further legislation should be introduced to extend the ban on ground rents to existing long leases.(3) The recommendation in subsection (2) must take into account the potential financial impact of an extension of the ban on ground rents on those leaseholders and tenants who have been charged for the cost of fire remediation work.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would require a review of the financial impact of this Act and make a recommendation as to whether a further extension of the ground rents ban could benefit existing leaseholders, especially those facing bills for fire remediation work.

Ayes 245, Noes 256.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Bishop0 28.0%
Con220 081.8%
Crossbench25 2929.7%
DUP1 140.0%
Green0 2100.0%
Lab0 12869.9%
LDem0 7486.0%
Non-affiliated9 931.6%
UUP1 050.0%
Total:256 24561.8%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Broers Crossbenchno
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carlile of BerriewCrossbenchno
Lord Chartres Crossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Cox Crossbenchno
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Dannatt Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Baroness Greengross Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Loomba Crossbenchno
Lord Macpherson of Earl's CourtCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Ravensdale Crossbenchno
Lord Stevens of KirkwhelpingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Walker of AldringhamCrossbenchno
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno
The Duke of WellingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Wilson of DintonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive