Leasehold Reform (Ground Rent) Bill [HL] — Report — Amendment 9 — 20 Jul 2021 at 15:30

Moved by Lord Stunell

9: After Clause 7, insert the following new Clause-“Duty to inform the tenant(1) Before entering a formal or informal renegotiation or extension of an existing lease, the landlord must inform the tenant of the changes introduced by this Act, if the sections of the Act in relation to prohibited rent are not yet in force.(2) An enforcement authority may impose a financial penalty on a person if the authority is satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the person has breached the duty in this section.(3) The amount of the financial penalty under subsection (2) is to be such amount as the authority determines but-(a) is not to be less than £500, and(b) is not to be more than £30,000.(4) This section comes into force on the day on which this Act is passed.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would require landlords to let tenants know of the upcoming changes to ground rents to try and prevent lease extensions before the changes in this Bill are implemented.

Ayes 243, Noes 238.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con0 20676.6%
Crossbench28 2126.9%
DUP0 120.0%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge0 19.1%
Lab126 068.9%
LDem77 089.5%
Non-affiliated8 726.3%
UUP0 2100.0%
Total:243 23858.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by vote

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Aberdare Crossbenchno
Lord Bhatia Non-affiliatedno
Viscount Brookeborough Crossbenchno
Baroness Butler-Sloss Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Carey of CliftonCrossbenchno
Lord Carrington Crossbenchno
Viscount Colville of CulrossCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Craig of RadleyCrossbenchno
Baroness D'Souza Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Dannatt Crossbenchno
The Earl of DevonCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Eames Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Lord Kakkar Crossbench (front bench)no
The Earl of KinnoullNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Laming Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Lupton Non-affiliatedno
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Lord St John of BletsoCrossbenchno
Lord Stirrup Crossbench (front bench)no
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Watkins of TavistockCrossbench (front bench)no
Lord Wilson of DintonCrossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive