Elections Bill — Second Reading — Voter ID — Overseas Voters — Postal Vote Misuse — 7 Sep 2021 at 18:50

The majority of MPs voted to require the production of identification to vote at a polling station in Parliamentary elections, to seek to prevent the corrupt use of postal votes and to allow British Citizens living overseas to vote, even if they have been out of the country for more than fifteen years.

MPs were considering the Elections Bill.[1][2][3]

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Second time.

The Bill contained provisions[2][3] to:

  • * introduce a requirement for identification to vote at polling station in Parliamentary elections. Acceptable identification includes certain passports, driving licences, travel cards, blue badges (as used by disabled people in relation to parking), and electoral identity documents.
  • * require electoral registration officers to provide a photographic "electoral identity document" or "anonymous elector’s document" as appropriate, free of charge, on request.
  • * generally make it an offence for a political campaigner to handle someone else's postal vote.
  • * to create offences connected with the communication of the official mark, or number, from the back of a ballot paper.
  • * remove the limit of 15 years after leaving the UK on "the exercise of voting rights currently placed on British electors living overseas".
  • * restrict third-party spending on election campaigns to UK based entities and eligible Overseas Electors.
  • * introduce a new disqualification order which a court must impose, "if a person is convicted of an intimidatory criminal offence motivated by hostility towards a candidate, future candidate, campaigner, substitute or nominee (in Northern Ireland), or holder of a relevant elective office. The effect of a disqualification order is that the person will be disqualified from standing for, being elected to, and holding any relevant elective office for five years."
  • * require "digital campaigning material to display a digital imprint, with the name and address of the promoter of the material or any person on behalf of whom the material is being published"


Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 20100.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con320 (+2 tell) 0088.5%
DUP5 0062.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 3080.0%
Lab0 169 (+2 tell)085.9%
LDem0 11091.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SNP0 38084.4%
Total:326 228087.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive