Dissolution and Calling of Parliament Bill — Third Reading — 13 Sep 2021 at 20:44

The majority of MPs voted for the monarch, rather than MPs, to have power to dissolve a Parliament, and prompt an early election.

MPs were considering the Bill[1][2][3]

The Bill provided for the repeal of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 and the restoration of the monarch's "prerogative powers to dissolve Parliament and to call a new Parliament".

The Bill included a provision continuing the approximately five year maximum time between elections for MPs which was also provided for in the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011:

  • If it has not been dissolved earlier, a Parliament dissolves at the beginning of the day that is the fifth anniversary of the day on which it first met.

Under the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 powers to prompt an early general election lay with the House of Commons.

The explanatory notes to the Bill[3] state, in respect of the position prior to the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011:

  • The exercise of the [monarch's] prerogative was, in practice, subject to constitutional conventions. For example, the Sovereign dissolved Parliament only when she was requested to do so by the Prime Minister, and in certain exceptional circumstances, the Sovereign could refuse to grant a dissolution.

The explanatory notes predict:

  • a future Parliament will be dissolved by the Sovereign, on the request of the Prime Minister, as it was prior to the enactment of the 2011 Act

MPs could always take back the power they give to the monarch via this Bill, however in this case the power may be used before they are able to do so.

Depending on how one interprets the United Kingdom's constitutional conventions one could argue either the monarch, or MPs, have the power to dissolve Parliament, in any case.

The Bill, if enacted, does amount to a shift in power from MPs to the monarch, which, given convention, is expected to amount in practice to a shift in power from MPs in the House of Commons to the Prime Minister.

The motion supported by a majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Third time.

Support for this motion meant the Bill could continue on the path to becoming law.

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 1050.0%
Con306 (+2 tell) 0084.6%
DUP3 0037.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 1040.0%
Lab0 000.0%
LDem0 120100.0%
PC0 30100.0%
SNP0 37 (+2 tell)086.7%
Total:310 55057.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by constituency

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive