Dormant Assets Bill [HL] — Report — Amendment 1 — 16 Nov 2021 at 16:15
Moved by Lord Bassam of Brighton
1: Clause 29, page 22, line 13, at end insert-“(1A) An order under this section may enable the creation of funds (to be known as “community wealth funds”) that may make grants and other payments to support the provision of social infrastructure to further the wellbeing of communities suffering from high levels of deprivation and low levels of social infrastructure.(1B) The Secretary of State may-(a) by order create one or more community wealth funds for a temporary period of at least 10 years, and(b) at the end of that period review the efficacy of the community wealth funds with a view to creating community wealth funds on a permanent basis.(1C) In subsection (1A), “social infrastructure” means-(a) buildings or other assets owned or managed by organisations located in communities for the purposes of local residents’ meeting, socialising, accessing educational resources, or conducting other activities to improve their wellbeing, or(b) organisations, whether incorporated or unincorporated, existing for the purposes set out in paragraph (a), (c), (d), (e), (f), (g), (i) or (j) of section 3(1) of the Charities Act 2011.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would enable orders under Clause 29 to create community wealth funds as a means of tackling deprivation and building social infrastructure in left-behind communities. It would mandate the Secretary of State to establish and review the effectiveness of one or more pilot schemes which would run over at least ten years.
Ayes 216, Noes 195.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 3.8% |
Con | 2 | 178 | 66.7% |
Crossbench | 32 | 5 | 20.3% |
DUP | 4 | 1 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 2 | 27.3% |
Lab | 99 | 0 | 55.9% |
LDem | 64 | 0 | 75.3% |
Non-affiliated | 10 | 7 | 29.8% |
UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
Total: | 216 | 195 | 50.2% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Goodlad | Con | aye |
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts | Con (front bench) | aye |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench | no |
Lord Janvrin | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Londesborough | Crossbench | no |
Lord Stirrup | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Vaux of Harrowden | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Dodds of Duncairn | DUP (front bench) | no |
Lord Hope of Craighead | Judge (front bench) | aye |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Fowler | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated | no |
The Earl of Kinnoull | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |