Armed Forces Bill — Clause 7 — Concurrent jurisdiction — 6 Dec 2021 at 20:37

“Military women are being denied justice. It is clear to us that serious sexual offences should not be tried in the court martial system.”
“The value of this amendment for women like me cannot be overstated… This amendment will make the process independent. It will encourage more service personnel to report crimes. It will mean we have some protection from the appalling consequences we suffer when we report rape within our units.
“I am urging the government to accept this amendment. As service personnel we are citizens of this country and we deserve justice just like everyone else.”
“many of the policy areas in which members of the Armed Forces community experience difficulty are the responsibility of national government or based on national guidance.”
“service personnel remain citizens and in these serious cases when the civil courts are available to them, they should be tried in that forum.”

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Con298 (+2 tell) 3184.2%
DUP0 5062.5%
Independent1 3066.7%
Lab0 168 (+2 tell)085.4%
LDem0 5041.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 30066.7%
Total:299 219182.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
Sarah AthertonWrexhamCon (front bench)no
Philip HolloboneKetteringCon (front bench)no
Johnny MercerPlymouth, Moor ViewCon (front bench)no
Thomas TugendhatTonbridge and MallingCon (front bench)both

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive