Nationality and Borders Bill — New Clause 6 — Exemptions for Child Victims of Modern Slavery, Exploitation or Trafficking — 8 Dec 2021 at 14:45

The majority of MPs voted not to exempt potential child victims of modern slavery, exploitation or trafficking from requirements to provide information to determine if they are in-fact a victim, not to exempt such children from being denied support on the grounds of being considered a threat to public order, or having claimed to be a victim in bad faith, and not to exempt them from a limit of one recovery period.

MPs were considering the Nationality and Borders Bill.[1][2][3]

The proposed new clause rejected by the majority of MPs in this vote was titled: Exemption for child victims of modern slavery, exploitation or trafficking and stated:

  • (1) The Secretary of State may not serve a slavery or trafficking information notice on a person in respect of an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.
  • (2) Section 61 of this Act does not apply in cases where either of the positive reasonable grounds decisions related to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.
  • (3) Section 62 of this Act does not apply in cases where the positive reasonable grounds decision related to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.
  • (4) Sections 64(3) and 64(6) of this Act do not apply in cases where the positive conclusive grounds decision related to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.

The rejected new clause was accompanied by the following explanatory statement from its proposer[4]:

  • This new clause would exempt victims of modern slavery, exploitation or trafficking from many of the provisions in Part 5 of the Bill if they were under 18 when they became a victim.

A slavery or trafficking information notice requires an individual to provide information required to assess if they are, or may be, a victim of modern slavery / human trafficking, to determine eligibility for help and support.[2][3]

Section 61 provided that only one period of recovery would be provided to a potential victim of modern slavery / human trafficking.[2][3]

Section 62 provided an exemption to the provision of a recovery period for a potential victim of modern slavery / human trafficking on the grounds that the individual is a threat to public order or has claimed to be a victim in bad faith.[2][3]

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alba0 20100.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con289 (+2 tell) 0080.4%
DUP0 5062.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 40100.0%
Lab0 165 (+2 tell)083.9%
LDem0 11091.7%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 40088.9%
Total:290 234082.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive