Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Bill — Report (5th Day) — Amendment 104E — 12 Jan 2022 at 18:30

Moved by Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede

104E: After Clause 172, insert the following new Clause-“Offence of requiring or accepting sexual relations as a condition of accommodation (1) It is an offence for a person (A) to require or accept from a person (B) sexual relations as a condition of access to or retention of accommodation or related services or transactions.(2) For the purposes of this section, A is-(a) a provider of accommodation,(b) an employee of a provider of accommodation,(c) an agent of a provider of accommodation, or(d) a contractor of a provider of accommodation.(3) A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable on conviction on indictment to imprisonment for a maximum of 7 years.”

Ayes 206, Noes 176.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit free service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your electricity and/or gas to Bulb Energy who provide 100% renewable electricity and tend to be 20% cheaper than the 'Big Six'. They'll also pay any exit fees (up to £120) from your old supplier AND give you (and us) a £50 credit for joining up via our Bulb Referral Link.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Con1 16361.0%
Crossbench36 522.7%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 136.4%
Lab94 053.4%
LDem59 069.4%
Non-affiliated10 628.1%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:206 17648.7%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Baroness Newlove Con (front bench)aye
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchno
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Lord Patel Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Trevethin and Oaksey Crossbench (front bench)no
The Duke of WellingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Brown of Eaton-under-HeywoodJudge (front bench)no
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
The Earl of KinnoullNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

PublicWhip v2 codebase is currently under development - you can join the Slack group to find out more or email [email protected]

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive