Judicial Review and Courts Bill — Third Reading — 25 Jan 2022 at 18:45

The majority of MPs voted for a series of measures intended to streamline and modernise elements of the justice system.

MPs were considering the Judicial Review and Courts Bill.[1][2][3]

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That the Bill be now read a Third time.

Support for the motion enabled the Bill to continue on its path to becoming law.

The Bill provided for:

  • * Changes to the Judicial Review rules, including introducing a suspended quashing order as a possible outcome, giving Parliament, or public bodies, time to respond to a decision and removing the ability to seek a judicial review of a decision by the Upper Tribunal on if to allow an appeal from the First-tier Tribunal.
  • * For certain individuals who plead guilty to be dealt with "online without the involvement of the court [or magistrate]" if the defendant agrees.
  • * To remove the need for a plea hearing in the magistrates' court in certain types of case, enabling the plea to be submitted in writing or online.
  • * The establishment of an Online Procedure Rule Committee to propose the rules for when, and how, court cases may be initiated, conducted, progressed, participated-in or disposed of by electronic means.
  • * "To allow virtual hearings in coroners’ courts"
  • * "To allow a coroner to discontinue an investigation where the cause of death is natural causes, without a post-mortem examination"
  • * "To allow inquests to proceed without a hearing in non-contentious cases"
  • * To revoke provisions which currently place duties on the Corporation of London to provide county and magistrates court capacity at the current locations.

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 1050.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con299 (+2 tell) 0183.7%
DUP6 0075.0%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 3080.0%
Lab0 147 (+2 tell)074.9%
LDem0 130100.0%
PC0 2066.7%
SDLP0 1050.0%
SNP0 41091.1%
Total:306 210181.4%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
James GrayNorth WiltshireCon (front bench)both

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive