National Insurance Contributions Bill — Report — Amendment 6 — 7 Feb 2022 at 17:00
Moved by Lord Tunnicliffe
6: Clause 7, page 5, line 24, at end insert-“(3) The Treasury may by regulations amend the period specified in subsection (1)(c) where it believes this will contribute to improved employment and retention rates among veterans.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would grant the Treasury a power to extend the eligibility period attached to zero-rate relief for armed forces veterans, should that be deemed desirable to improve the ability of veterans to find long-term employment.
Ayes 197, Noes 175.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Con | 1 | 163 | 61.7% |
Crossbench | 15 | 6 | 11.7% |
DUP | 3 | 0 | 60.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 1 | 18.2% |
Lab | 99 | 0 | 56.3% |
LDem | 65 | 0 | 76.5% |
Non-affiliated | 8 | 5 | 22.8% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Total: | 197 | 175 | 47.3% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Flight | Con | aye |
Lord Anderson of Ipswich | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kakkar | Crossbench | no |
Lord Laming | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Londesborough | Crossbench | no |
Lord Pannick | Crossbench | no |
Lord Patel | Crossbench | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Baroness Hoey | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Moore of Etchingham | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |