Nationality and Borders Bill — Report (3rd Day) — Amendment 70ZA — 8 Mar 2022 at 19:40
Moved by Lord Coaker
70ZA: After Clause 64, insert the following new Clause-“Slavery and human trafficking: victims aged under 18 years(1) Where a competent authority is making a decision in relation to a person who is aged under 18 years, the best interests of the child must be a primary consideration.(2) The Secretary of State may not serve a slavery or trafficking information notice on a person in respect of an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.(3) Section 61 of this Act does not apply in cases where either the first reasonable grounds decision or a further reasonable grounds decision made in relation to a person relates to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.(4) Section 62 of this Act does not apply in cases where a positive reasonable grounds decision has been made in respect of a person which relates to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years.(5) The Secretary of State must grant a person leave to remain in the United Kingdom where a positive conclusive grounds decision is made in respect of a person who-(a) is under 18 years, or(b) was under 18 years at the time of the incident or incidents to which the positive reasonable grounds decision relates.(6) Section 64 of this Act does not apply to a person who is eligible for leave to remain under subsection (5). (7) Guidance issued under section 49(1)(c) of the Modern Slavery Act 2015 on determining whether there are reasonable grounds to believe that a person is a victim of slavery or human trafficking must provide that, where the determination relates to an incident or incidents which occurred when the person was aged under 18 years, the determination must be made on the standard of “suspect but not prove”.”
Ayes 194, Noes 128.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 6 | 0 | 25.0% |
Con | 1 | 119 | 44.9% |
Crossbench | 30 | 4 | 19.0% |
DUP | 5 | 0 | 100.0% |
Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 2 | 0 | 18.2% |
Lab | 83 | 0 | 47.2% |
LDem | 56 | 0 | 66.7% |
Non-affiliated | 8 | 4 | 21.1% |
PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 194 | 128 | 39.9% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Patten of Barnes | Con | aye |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Fox of Buckley | Non-affiliated | no |
Lord Green of Deddington | Crossbench | no |
Lord Kilclooney | Crossbench | no |
The Earl of Kinnoull | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Patel | Crossbench | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |