Judicial Review and Courts Bill — Report — Amendment 1 — 31 Mar 2022 at 14:00
Moved by Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames
1: Clause 1, page 1, leave out line 9Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment, and others in the name of Lord Marks to Clause 1, would remove the power to include provision in quashing orders removing or limiting their retrospective effect (“prospective only quashing orders”).
Ayes 148, Noes 143.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 127 | 47.6% |
| Crossbench | 15 | 7 | 12.3% |
| DUP | 0 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 0 | 2 | 18.2% |
| Lab | 76 | 0 | 43.2% |
| LDem | 50 | 0 | 59.5% |
| Non-affiliated | 4 | 5 | 15.8% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 148 | 143 | 37.1% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Viscount Colville of Culross | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Dannatt | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Deech | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Macpherson of Earl's Court | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Sentamu | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Watkins of Tavistock | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Woolf | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Cashman | Non-affiliated | aye |
| Lord Desai | Non-affiliated | aye |
| Baroness Kennedy of Cradley | Non-affiliated | aye |
| Lord Smith of Finsbury | Non-affiliated | aye |