Judicial Review and Courts Bill — Report — Amendment 4 — 31 Mar 2022 at 14:28
Moved by Lord Etherton
4: Clause 1, page 2, leave out lines 24 to 32Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the presumption that where a suspended or prospective-only quashing order would offer adequate redress, such a quashing order should be made in preference to an ordinary quashing order.
Ayes 159, Noes 134.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Con | 0 | 126 | 47.2% |
| Crossbench | 23 | 2 | 14.0% |
| DUP | 0 | 1 | 20.0% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 2 | 1 | 27.3% |
| Lab | 75 | 0 | 42.6% |
| LDem | 51 | 0 | 60.7% |
| Non-affiliated | 5 | 3 | 14.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 159 | 134 | 37.4% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by name
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Brown of Eaton-under-Heywood | Judge | no |
| Lord Dannatt | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Baroness Deech | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
| Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
| Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |