Nationality and Borders Bill — Clause 40 — Offence of Assisting an Asylum Seeker — 20 Apr 2022 at 17:48

The majority of MPs voted to make it an offence to help an asylum-seeker enter the UK, even if that help is offered for free and there is a reasonable excuse for helping, subject to an exception for those acting on behalf of an organisation which helps asylum seekers for free.

Prior to the Bill it had been an offence to help an asylum-seeker enter United Kingdom "for gain", but not otherwise.

MPs were considering the Nationality and Borders Bill.[1][2][3]

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 20B

Lords amendment 20B stated:[4]

  • Page 41, line 40, leave out “omit “and for gain”” and insert “for “for gain” substitute “without reasonable excuse””

Had it not been rejected this amendment would have replaced a provision in the Bill[2] which stated:

  • In section 25A(1)(a) (helping asylum seeker to enter United Kingdom) omit “and for gain”.

This provision in-turn provided for an amendment to Section 25A(1)(a Immigration Act 1971[5] which, at the time of the vote, stated:

  • A person commits an offence if—
  • (a)he knowingly and for gain facilitates the arrival or attempted arrival in, or the entry or attempted entry into, the United Kingdom of an individual, and
  • (b)he knows or has reasonable cause to believe that the individual is an asylum-seeker.

An exemption was provided for organisations which help those seeking asylum free of charge.

The Bill provides for subclause (a) to become:

  • (a)he knowingly facilitates the arrival or attempted arrival in, or the entry or attempted entry into, the United Kingdom of an individual, and

If the amendment which was the subject of this vote had been approved the subsection would become:

  • (a)he knowingly and without reasonable excuse facilitates the arrival or attempted arrival in, or the entry or attempted entry into, the United Kingdom of an individual, and

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 1050.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con303 (+2 tell) 0084.3%
DUP3 0037.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 4080.0%
Lab0 161 (+2 tell)081.5%
LDem0 12092.3%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 42093.3%
Total:306 227083.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive