Nationality and Borders Bill — Clause 62 — Identified Potential Victims etc: Disqualification From Protection — 20 Apr 2022 at 17:48

The majority of MPs voted to deny those convicted of false imprisonment, kidnapping, manslaughter, murder, perverting the course of justice or piracy the 30 day "recovery period" offered to victims of modern slavery during which they may not be removed from, or required to leave, the United Kingdom; and not to hold a consultation if they should be so denied.

MPs were considering the Nationality and Borders Bill.[1][2][3]

The motion supported by the majority of MPs in this vote was:

  • That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 25B

Lords amendment 25B began:[4]

  • Leave out Clause 62 and insert the following new Clause—
  • Identified potential victims etc: disqualification from protection
  • (1) This section applies to the construction and application of Article 13 of the Trafficking Convention.
  • (2) A competent authority may determine that it is not bound to observe the minimum recovery period under section 60 of this Act in respect of a person in relation to whom a positive reasonable grounds decision has been made if the authority is satisfied that it is prevented from doing so—
  • (a) as a result of an immediate, genuine, present and serious threat to public order, or
  • (b) because the person is claiming to be a victim of modern slavery improperly
  • For the purposes of section (2)(a), a person is considered as presenting an immediate, genuine, present and serious threat to public order where the person has been convicted of a terrorist offence
  • (4) The Secretary of State must, within one year of this Act coming into force— (a) prepare and publish a consultation on whether a person convicted of any offence listed in Schedule 4 to the Modern Slavery Act 2015, other than a terrorist offence, should be considered as presenting an immediate, genuine, present and serious threat to public order for the purposes of section (2)(a); and
  • (b) lay a response to the consultation before each House of Parliament.

Clause 62 of the Bill[2] had the same title: Identified potential victims etc: disqualification from protection.

The Lords amendment refers to "claiming to be a victim of modern slavery improperly", the Bill used the phrase "in bad faith" rather than "improperly".

The Lords amendment refers to Article 13 of the Trafficking Convention, the Bill does not.

The Lords amendment provides for a consultation on if the commission of each of the offences in Schedule 4 to the Modern Slavery Act 2015 should prevent someone being entitled to a recovery period, whereas the Bill stated they would.

The offences listed in Schedule 4 to the Modern Slavery Act 2015[6] are: false imprisonment; kidnapping; manslaughter; murder; perverting the course of justice and piracy.

--

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Aye)Minority (No)BothTurnout
Alba0 1050.0%
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con306 (+2 tell) 0085.1%
DUP0 3037.5%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent0 4080.0%
Lab0 159 (+2 tell)080.5%
LDem0 11084.6%
PC0 30100.0%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 40088.9%
Total:306 225083.3%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive