Fair Taxation of Schools and Education Standards Committee — 11 Jan 2023 at 15:19

“Removing the tax advantages of private schools would boost standards in the state sector and raise vital extra funds”.
“charitable status for most private schools is something that should come to an end. The monies saved by Government from these concessions could be used for more teachers”.
“That tax advantage allows the wealthiest in this country, indeed the very wealthiest in the globe, to buy a prestige service that secures their children a permanent positional edge in society at an effective 20% discount. How can this be justified?”
“Everyone should have the opportunity to succeed.”
“the recruitment of new teachers, additional teacher training, and careers advice and work experience for all pupils.”
“When children sit down to eat with friends and teachers in a civilised environment, it cements relationships, helps them to develop social skills and reinforces positive behaviour throughout the day.”
“Teachers and support staff see the difference a healthy school dinner makes.”
“This will not touch the sides when we factor in our own increased energy costs, staffing costs and now having to subsidise school dinners.”
“There shall be a select committee, to be called the Fair Taxation of Schools and Education Standards Committee”.
“It is not clear why private schools, many of whose costs to parents are literally in the stratosphere, should be regarded as charities. To what purpose?”
“Private school fees are VAT-exempt. That tax advantage allows the wealthiest in this country, indeed the very wealthiest in the globe, to buy a prestige service that secures their children a permanent positional edge in society at an effective 20 per cent discount. How can this be justified?”
“Introducing multimodal assessments so that young people’s progress is no longer measured solely through written exams.”
“education is a necessity, not a luxury”.
“antagonism between the independent sector and the state sector”,

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What are Boths? An MP can vote both aye and no in the same division. The boths page explains this.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (No)Minority (Aye)BothTurnout
Alliance0 10100.0%
Con302 (+2 tell) 0085.4%
Green0 10100.0%
Independent1 4041.7%
Lab0 158 (+2 tell)081.2%
LDem0 000.0%
PC0 2066.7%
SDLP0 20100.0%
SNP0 27060.0%
Total:303 195079.6%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

MPs for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible MP who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Constituency | Party | Vote

NameConstituencyPartyVote
no rebellions

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive