Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill — Report — Amendment 21 — 25 Jan 2023 at 18:30

Moved by Baroness Jones of Whitchurch

21: After Clause 12, insert the following new Clause-“Additional factors to be considered in relation to a precision bred animal marketing authorisation(1) When producing a report under section 12, the welfare advisory body may choose to consider the factors listed in subsection (3).(2) In the event that a report of the welfare advisory body does not consider the factors listed in subsection (3), the Secretary of State must do so prior to making a decision under section 13(1) regarding the issuing of a precision bred animal marketing authorisation.(3) The additional factors to be considered in relation to a precision bred animal marketing authorisation are-(a) whether the precision bred traits will have a direct or indirect adverse effect on the health or welfare of the relevant animal or its qualifying progeny,(b) whether the relevant animal or its qualifying progeny are likely to experience pain, suffering or lasting harm arising from or connected with precision bred traits that aim to produce increased yields, faster growth or any other increase in productivity, and(c) whether the precision bred traits may facilitate the keeping of the relevant animal or its qualifying progeny in conditions that are likely to have an adverse effect on animal health or welfare.”Member's explanatory statementThis new Clause would introduce a small number of additional animal welfare factors to be considered by the welfare advisory body or Secretary of State prior to the granting of a precision bred animal marketing authorisation.

Ayes 173, Noes 193.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con173 (+2 tell) 063.2%
Crossbench8 1110.7%
DUP4 066.7%
Green0 2100.0%
Independent Labour0 1100.0%
Judge2 127.3%
Lab0 94 (+2 tell)53.0%
LDem0 5566.3%
Non-affiliated4 617.9%
PC0 1100.0%
Total:191 17146.0%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Carrington Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Curry of KirkharleCrossbenchno
Baroness Falkner of MargravineCrossbenchno
Lord Faulks Non-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Lord Geidt Crossbenchno
Lord Greenway Crossbenchno
Baroness Masham of IltonCrossbenchno
Lord Mawson Crossbenchno
Lord Pannick Crossbenchno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Thomas of CwmgieddJudge (front bench)aye

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive