Public Order Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 56 — 7 Feb 2023 at 18:15
Moved by Lord Anderson of Ipswich
56: Clause 19, page 22, line 20, leave out sub-paragraphs (iii) to (v)Member's explanatory statementThis amendment would limit the trigger events for an SDPO to the commission of a protest-related offence and the breach of a protest-related injunction.
Ayes 259, Noes 200.
Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please
consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 5 | 0 | 20.0% |
| Con | 2 | 186 (+2 tell) | 68.8% |
| Crossbench | 46 | 1 | 26.4% |
| DUP | 0 | 5 | 83.3% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 4 | 0 | 36.4% |
| Lab | 120 (+2 tell) | 0 | 67.4% |
| LDem | 66 | 0 | 79.5% |
| Non-affiliated | 10 | 4 | 25.0% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 2 | 100.0% |
| Total: | 257 | 198 | 55.8% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by vote
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Garnier | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Viscount Hailsham | Con | aye |
| Lord Bew | Crossbench | no |
| Baroness Foster of Aghadrumsee | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Fowler | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
| Lord Tyrie | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |