Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill — Report — Amendment 5 — 26 Apr 2023 at 17:36

Moved by Lord Collins of Highbury

5: The Schedule, page 5, leave out lines 9 to 22Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would remove the section that removes protection from Unions.

Ayes 220, Noes 196.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con1 183 (+2 tell)67.4%
Crossbench30 620.6%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge3 027.3%
Lab109 (+2 tell) 061.7%
LDem62 074.7%
Non-affiliated8 421.4%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:218 19451.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by name

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Lord Balfe Conaye
Lord Butler of BrockwellCrossbench (front bench)no
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Baroness Deech Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Fowler Non-affiliatedno
Lord Mawson Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Moore of EtchinghamNon-affiliatedno
Earl Peel Crossbenchno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Truscott Non-affiliatedno
Viscount Waverley Crossbenchno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive