Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill — Commons Amendments and Reasons — Motion E1 (as an amendment to Motion E) — 6 Jun 2023 at 16:46

Moved by Lord Anderson of Ipswich

42B: After Clause 15, insert the following new Clause-“Parliamentary scrutiny (1) A Minister of the Crown may not make regulations under section 15 unless- (a) a document containing a proposal for those regulations has been laid before each House of Parliament, (b) the document has been referred to, and considered by, a Committee of the House of Commons (‘the Committee’), and (c) a period of at least 30 days has elapsed after that referral, not including any period during which Parliament is dissolved or prorogued or either House is adjourned for more than four days. (2) If the Committee determines that special attention should be drawn to the regulations in question, a Minister of the Crown must arrange for the instrument to be debated on the floor of each House and voted on before the period in subsection (1)(c) elapses. (3) If any amendments to the regulations, whether or not proposed by the Committee, are agreed by both Houses of Parliament, the regulations must be made in the form so amended.(4) If one House agrees amendments to the regulations under subsection (3), the regulations may not be made until the other House has debated and voted on a motion to agree or disagree with those amendments.””

Ayes 257, Noes 182.

Debate in Parliament |

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop1 04.0%
Con12 166 (+2 tell)65.2%
Crossbench52 (+2 tell) 231.6%
DUP0 466.7%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge1 09.1%
Lab114 063.3%
LDem59 071.1%
Non-affiliated12 733.9%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:255 18053.5%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Baroness Altmann Conaye
Lord Clarke of NottinghamConaye
Lord Cormack Con (front bench)aye
Lord Deben Conaye
Lord Glenarthur Con (front bench)aye
Viscount Goschen Conaye
Viscount Hailsham Conaye
Lord Kirkhope of HarrogateCon (front bench)aye
Lord Livingston of ParkheadConaye
Baroness McIntosh of PickeringCon (front bench)aye
Lord Northbrook Conaye
Lord Patten of BarnesConaye
Lord Hogan-Howe Crossbench (front bench)no
Lord Stevens of KirkwhelpingtonCrossbenchno
Lord Faulks Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Foster of AghadrumseeNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Fox of BuckleyNon-affiliatedno
Baroness Hoey Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonNon-affiliatedno
Lord Tyrie Non-affiliated (front bench)no

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive