Strikes (Minimum Service Levels) Bill — Commons Reasons — Motion C1 (as an amendment to Motion C) — 8 Jun 2023 at 14:30
Moved by Baroness O’Grady of Upper Holloway
4B: Page 4, line 40, at end insert-“234CA Protection of employees(1) A person is not subject to a work notice if they have not received a copy of it in accordance with the time limits specified in section 234C(3). (2) It is for the employer to prove that the work notice was received in conformity with subsection (1).(3) An employee may not be dismissed or subjected to any detriment for failing to comply with a work notice and any such dismissal shall be treated as a dismissal to which section 152 applies and any such detriment shall be treated as a detriment to which section 146 applies.(4) A work notice does not place a contractual obligation on an employee to comply with it.””
Ayes 180, Noes 150.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
Bishop | 1 | 0 | 4.0% |
Con | 1 | 142 (+2 tell) | 52.5% |
Crossbench | 14 | 2 | 9.1% |
Green | 1 | 0 | 50.0% |
Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
Judge | 1 | 0 | 9.1% |
Lab | 103 (+2 tell) | 0 | 58.7% |
LDem | 49 | 0 | 58.3% |
Non-affiliated | 7 | 3 | 18.2% |
UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
Total: | 178 | 148 | 40.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
Name | Party | Vote |
Lord Balfe | Con | aye |
Viscount Craigavon | Crossbench | no |
Lord Cromwell | Crossbench (front bench) | no |
Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated | no |
Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |
Lord Verdirame | Non-affiliated | no |