Illegal Migration Bill — Report (1st Day) — Amendment 14 — 28 Jun 2023 at 19:15

Moved by Lord Dubs

14: Clause 4, page 6, line 11, after “2” insert “and does not fall within the exceptions in section 3”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would make asylum and human rights claims admissible from unaccompanied children, who are exempted from the duty to remove by Clause 3. This would continue current policy under which unaccompanied children’s asylum claims are not subject to the inadmissibility regime.

Ayes 185, Noes 133.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Content)Minority (Not-Content)Turnout
Bishop3 012.0%
Con0 125 (+2 tell)45.7%
Crossbench24 315.4%
Green2 0100.0%
Independent Labour1 0100.0%
Judge1 010.0%
Lab85 (+2 tell) 048.9%
LDem60 071.4%
Non-affiliated6 214.0%
PC1 0100.0%
UUP0 150.0%
Total:183 13139.1%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

NamePartyVote
Viscount Craigavon Crossbenchno
Lord Green of DeddingtonCrossbenchno
Earl Peel Crossbenchno
Baroness Stowell of BeestonNon-affiliated (front bench)no
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive