Illegal Migration Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 51 — 3 Jul 2023 at 15:38
Moved by Baroness Mobarik
51: Clause 10, page 15, leave out lines 10 to 35 and insert-“(2D) Detention under sub-paragraph (2C) is to be treated as detention under paragraph 16(2) for the purposes of the limitations in paragraph 18B (limitation on detention of unaccompanied children).””Member's explanatory statementThis amendment, with others to Clause 10 in the name of Baroness Mobarik, would retain existing limits on the detention of unaccompanied children (24 hours).
Ayes 230, Noes 152.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 3 | 0 | 12.0% |
| Con | 3 | 143 (+2 tell) | 53.2% |
| Crossbench | 47 | 2 | 28.2% |
| DUP | 2 | 0 | 33.3% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Judge | 1 | 0 | 10.0% |
| Lab | 104 (+2 tell) | 0 | 59.6% |
| LDem | 54 | 0 | 64.3% |
| Non-affiliated | 10 | 4 | 24.6% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 228 | 150 | 46.7% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Baroness Helic | Con | aye |
| Baroness Mobarik | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Baroness Sugg | Con (front bench) | aye |
| Lord Bew | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Green of Deddington | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Fowler | Non-affiliated | no |
| Lord Gadhia | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |