Illegal Migration Bill — Report (2nd Day) — Amendment 95 — 3 Jul 2023 at 18:13
Moved by Lord Randall of Uxbridge
95: Clause 21, page 26, leave out line 38 and insert-“(3A) Subsection (2) also does not apply in relation to a person if the relevant exploitation took place in the United Kingdom. (3B) Where subsection (3) or (3A) applies in relation to a person the following do not apply in relation to the person-(a) section 22,(b) section 23, and(c) section 24.(4) In this section-”Member's explanatory statementThis amendment is intended to exempt people who have been unlawfully exploited in the UK from provisions which would otherwise require their removal during the statutory recovery period and prohibit them from being provided with support during the recovery period or being granted limited leave to remain.
Ayes 214, Noes 150.
Party Summary
Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.
What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.
What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.| Party | Majority (Content) | Minority (Not-Content) | Turnout |
| Bishop | 2 | 0 | 8.0% |
| Con | 1 | 143 (+2 tell) | 52.5% |
| Crossbench | 35 | 2 | 21.3% |
| DUP | 4 | 0 | 66.7% |
| Green | 2 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Independent Labour | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| Lab | 99 (+2 tell) | 0 | 56.7% |
| LDem | 59 | 0 | 70.2% |
| Non-affiliated | 8 | 2 | 17.5% |
| PC | 1 | 0 | 100.0% |
| UUP | 0 | 1 | 50.0% |
| Total: | 212 | 148 | 45.0% |
Rebel Voters - sorted by party
Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division
| Name | Party | Vote |
| Lord Randall of Uxbridge | Con | aye |
| Lord Greenway | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Hogan-Howe | Crossbench | no |
| Lord Faulks | Non-affiliated | no |
| Baroness Stowell of Beeston | Non-affiliated (front bench) | no |