Online Safety Bill — Report (5th Day) — Amendment 258ZA — 19 Jul 2023 at 19:00

Moved by Lord Allan of Hallam

258ZA: After Clause 114, insert the following new Clause-“Review by the Information Commissioner of notices under Section 111(1)(1) Where a provider believes that a notice it has been given under section 111(1) will have a material impact on the private communications of its users, it may request a review by the Information Commissioner.(2) The review must consider the compatibility of the notice with-(a) the Human Rights Act 1998,(b) the Data Protection Act 2018,(c) the Privacy and Electronic Communications (EC Directive) Regulations 2003, and(d) any other legislation the Information Commissioner considers relevant.(3) In carrying out the review, the Information Commissioner must consult-(a) OFCOM,(b) the provider,(c) UK users of the provider’s service, and (d) such other persons as the Information Commissioner considers appropriate.(4) Following a review under subsection (1) the Information Commissioner must publish a report including-(a) their determination of the compatibility of the notice with relevant legislation,(b) their reasons for making such a determination, and(c) their advice to OFCOM in respect of the drafting and implementation of the notice.”Member’s explanatory statementThis amendment would give providers a right to request an assessment by the ICO of the compatibility of a section 111 order with UK privacy legislation.

Ayes 70, Noes 178.

Debate in Parliament |

Public Whip is run as a free not-for-profit service. If you'd like to support us, please consider switching your (UK) electricity and/or gas to Octopus Energy or tip us via Ko-Fi.

Party Summary

Votes by party, red entries are votes against the majority for that party.

What is Tell? '+1 tell' means that in addition one member of that party was a teller for that division lobby.

What is Turnout? This is measured against the total membership of the party at the time of the vote.

PartyMajority (Not-Content)Minority (Content)Turnout
Con161 (+2 tell) 057.2%
Crossbench8 78.7%
DUP3 050.0%
Green0 150.0%
Judge1 010.0%
Lab0 63.4%
LDem0 49 (+2 tell)60.7%
Non-affiliated3 514.0%
Total:176 6831.2%

Rebel Voters - sorted by party

Lords for which their vote in this division differed from the majority vote of their party. You can see all votes in this division, or every eligible lord who could have voted in this division

Sort by: Name | Party | Vote

Baroness Deech Crossbench (front bench)aye
The Earl of ErrollCrossbenchaye
Baroness Falkner of MargravineCrossbenchaye
Baroness Finlay of LlandaffCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Hannay of ChiswickCrossbench (front bench)aye
Baroness Hunt of Bethnal GreenCrossbenchaye
Baroness Watkins of TavistockCrossbench (front bench)aye
Lord Gadhia Non-affiliatedno
Baroness Stuart of EdgbastonNon-affiliatedno
Lord Taylor of WarwickNon-affiliatedno

About the Project

The Public Whip is a not-for-profit, open source website created in 2003 by Francis Irving and Julian Todd and now run by Bairwell Ltd.

The Whip on the Web

Help keep PublicWhip alive